Cem Ilkel vs Tim Van Rijthoven Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Ilkel vs T. Van Rijthoven

Cem Ilkel

TUR

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

6'2" (188 cm)

595

C. Rank

871

144

Best Rank

101

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$225.5K

Career Money

$499.6K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Tim Van Rijthoven

NED

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

6'2" (188 cm)

595

C. Rank

871

144

Best Rank

101

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$225.5K

Career Money

$499.6K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Ilkel 2 - 0 Rijthoven

They have played 4 sets in total, with Cem Ilkel winning 4 and Tim Van Rijthoven winning 0. The last match between Cem Ilkel and Tim Van Rijthoven was at the Bratislava Challenger, 11-11-2022, Round: QF, Surface: I.hard, with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 6-4 7-5.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Ilkel	2
Rijthoven	0

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(QF) Bratislava Challenger(11-11-22)

Stats

Cem Ilkel

Tim Van Rijthoven

(QF) Pozoblanco Challenger(07-23-21)

Stats

Cem Ilkel

Tim Van Rijthoven

C. Ilkel vs T. V. Rijthoven H2H Profile

C. Ilkel	Stats	T. V. Rijthoven
$225,530	Career Prize Money	$499,600
56.52% (438-337)	Career Total W/L	61.42% (234-147)
1	Hard	0
1	Indoor	0
7	Titles	9
2	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

C. Ilkel vs T. V. Rijthoven Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cem Ilkel has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Tim Van Rijthoven has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cem Ilkel, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tim Van Rijthoven has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Cem Ilkel has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tim Van Rijthoven has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Cem Ilkel has won 71.43% of matches played (W/L 30/12), with Tim Van Rijthoven winning 0% (W/L 0/2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Cem Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 288/181), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/9). Tim Van Rijthoven has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 80/43), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 61/48).
Player level: In the last year, Cem Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 76.32% of matches (W/L 29/9), where as Tim Van Rijthoven has played most of their matches on the Grand Slam, winning 0.00% of matches (W/L 0/2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Cem Ilkel winning 2 times and Tim Van Rijthoven being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Cem Ilkel winning 4 and Tim Van Rijthoven winning 0.
The last match between Cem Ilkel and Tim Van Rijthoven was at the Bratislava Challenger, 11-11-2022, Round: QF, Surface: I.hard, with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:42:59.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cem Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 420.69 while Tim Van Rijthoven has played against players with an average rank of 195.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cem Ilkel has won 80% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tim Van Rijthoven has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Cem Ilkel has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tim Van Rijthoven has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Cem Ilkel vs Tim Van Rijthoven Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. Ilkel vs T. V. Rijthoven H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. Ilkel	Stats	T. V. Rijthoven
2	H2H Matches Won	0
4	Sets Won	0
27	Games Won	20
15	Aces (Total)	22
0	Total Double Faults	1
1:42:59	Average Match Time	1:42:59
58% (88/153)	1st Serve %	63% (91/145)
81% (71/88)	1st Serve Win %	74% (67/91)
58% (38/65)	2nd Serve Win %	59% (32/54)
38% (3/8)	Break Pts Won %	0% (0/7)
32% (46/145)	Return Points Win %	29% (44/153)
100% (2/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/2)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

C. Ilkel Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Chisinau Challenger - 26-05-2025
R2 Petr Bar BiryukovP. Bar	L	6-4 6-7(5) 7-6(7)	Stats
R1 Mukund SasikumarM. Sasikumar	W	6-4 6-3	Stats
Tbilisi Challenger - 19-05-2025
Q1 Giles HusseyG. Hussey	L	7-6(4) 6-3	Stats
M25 Tbilisi - 12-05-2025
R1 Evgeny KarlovskiyE. Karlovskiy	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
M25 Sharm ElSheikh - 21-04-2025
SF Saba PurtseladzeS. Purtseladze	L	6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

T. V. Rijthoven Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
French Open - Paris - 26-05-2025
Q1 Sascha Gueymard WayenburgS. Gueymard	L	7-6(4) 6-0	Stats
Australian Open - Melbourne - 13-01-2025
Q1 Jerome KymJ. Kym	L	6-0 6-3	Stats
U.S. Open - New York - 26-08-2024
Q1 Kyrian JacquetK. Jacquet	L	6-2 7-5	Stats
Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger - 12-08-2024
R1 Manuel GuinardM. Guinard	L	6-7(4) 6-0 6-3	Stats
Wimbledon - London - 01-07-2024
Q1 Yasutaka UchiyamaY. Uchiyama	L	6-7(6) 7-6(3) 6-1	Stats

View All

C. Ilkel vs T. V. Rijthoven Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. Ilkel	Stats	T. V. Rijthoven
56.52% (438/337)	YTD Win/Loss	61.42% (234/147)
54.63% (979/813)	Sets Win/Loss	58.83% (523/366)
51.54% (8791/8267)	Games Win/Loss	52.51% (4644/4200)
61.41% (288/181)	Hard Win/Loss	65.04% (80/43)
44.53% (57/71)	Clay Win/Loss	55.96% (61/48)
54.76% (92/76)	Indoor Hard W/L	62.50% (85/51)
10.00% (1/9)	Grass Win/Loss	61.54% (8/5)
0.34	Aces Per Game	0.62
2865	Aces Total	2679
0.17	Double Faults Per Game	0.2
1385	Total Double Faults	856
1:15:9	Average Match Time	1:29:3
561.7	Average Opponent Rank	215.86
58% (24152/41308)	1st Serve %	63% (15453/24382)
70% (16999/24152)	1st Serve Win %	75% (11614/15453)
51% (8757/17156)	2nd Serve Win %	54% (4789/8929)
40% (1622/4023)	Break Points Won % (Total)	39% (802/2067)
39% (16247/41803)	Return Points Win %	36% (9251/25495)
31.82% (7/15)	Slam W/L	43.75% (7/9)
66.67% (2/1)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
31.82% (7/15)	Cups W/L	66.67% (2/1)
17.86% (5/23)	Main Tour W/L	50.00% (13/13)
52.23% (176/161)	Challenger W/L	55.26% (84/68)
66.39% (241/122)	Futures W/L	69.57% (128/56)
56% (426/756)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	62% (227/367)
40% (4/10)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	67% (4/6)
53% (147/275)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	57% (99/174)
56% (130/233)	Deciding Set Win %	59% (74/125)
85% (424/362)	1st Set Won, Won Match	88% (227/199)
14% (424/60)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	12% (227/27)
21% (350/74)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	22% (154/34)